PRE-TGE · BUILT ON BASE

The operating system for autonomous AI agents

GEBRID OS creates, deploys, coordinates and controls AI agents — through a Security, Guardian and Continuity control plane that enforces permissions and risk limits on-chain.

Security Kernel v2 RC189 contract tests passed, 0 failures — internal report, local chain
Enforcement core5 contracts and 127 tests · code review under NDA
DeploymentBase Sepolia next · mainnet after an external audit

Why now

AI agents now move real money

AI agents market

$52.6B

projected by 2030

Up from $7.8B in 2025 — 46.3% a year (MarketsandMarkets). Every agent that touches capital needs limits it can’t talk its way past.

May 2026 · incident on Base

An AI agent was prompt-injected into sending ≈$150–200K in tokens

A gifted NFT escalated the agent’s permissions; a Morse-code message then got it to sign the transfer. No private keys were stolen (OECD AI Incidents Monitor).

The model’s reading of a prompt was enough to move funds. GEBRID’s rule: a model may propose, never authorize.

The problem

Owners have no single control layer

Agents already analyze data, write code, call tools and assemble financial operations without a human in the loop. Point products cover pieces. No system unifies the ten controls an owner needs.

01

Manage many agents centrally

02

Grant & revoke permissions

03

Isolated execution

04

Independent review of risky actions

05

State that survives migration

06

Tool & API access control

07

Spending limits

08

Verifiable action history

09

Identity & transferable ownership

10

Multi-agent coordination

The solution

One operating layer for AI agents

GEBRID OS creates, deploys, coordinates and controls autonomous agents — financial, analytical, enterprise and Web3 — inside limits that can be verified.

AI Agents
+
Operating System
+
Guardian Security
+
Controlled Execution
+
Digital Ownership
=

Governed autonomy

Agents that act on capital, apps and other agents — inside limits they can’t exceed.

Today: the on-chain security and permission core is built and tested locally. The full operating system ships in phases.

Design principle

AI proposes.
Code decides.

A language model never gets the right to approve a financial operation around mandatory checks. Permissions, budgets and risk limits are enforced by deterministic code at the smart-account level — not by prompts, and not by the model’s judgment.

How an action executes

Three mandatory gates before any action

  1. 01

    Agent intent

    The LLM proposes an action

  2. 02

    Guardian & policy

    Screens intent against owner rules

    MANDATORY GATE
  3. 03

    Permission check

    Signed, bounded, revocable

    MANDATORY GATE
  4. 04

    Risk enforcement

    RiskEngine decides on-chain

    MANDATORY GATE
  5. 05

    Authorized execution

    The smart account executes

  6. 06

    Audit record

    Verifiable action history

Fail any gate → the action never executes

Built and tested locally (Kernel v2 RC): the permission and risk gates on the on-chain path. Guardian AI screening is in research.

Architecture

Thirteen subsystems, one control plane

Built · tested locallyPrototypePlanned
APPS
Agent Marketplace & Licensing
Developer PlatformSDK 3/3 tests · local RC only
AGENTS
Agent Factory & Builder
Agent Orchestrator
Runtime & Sandbox
Memory & Continuity
KERNEL
GEBRID OS KernelLifecycle · permissions · resources · stop and resume — includes the EVM Security Kernel v2 RC (built)
SECURITY
Guardian · AIResearch
Guardian · Policy & EnforcementPolicy partly built
MCP & Tool GatewaySkill checks
Capital & Risk Engine
Identity & OwnershipERC-721 · ERC-6551
EXECUTION
Execution EngineAuthorized on-chain transfers verified locally · contract calls, APIs and enterprise actions planned
CROSS-CUTTING
Audit, Monitoring & AnalyticsLocal logs and integrity checks

Status per subsystem as of 4 November 2026. Full integration of the operating system is not yet confirmed.

Guardian security layer

Three layers check every action

GUARDIAN AIPOLICYENFORCEEXECUTE

1 · Guardian AI

Research

Independent review of intent by two LLMs from different angles: manipulated instructions, swapped payment details, context that breaks owner limits.

2 · Guardian Policy

Partly built

Formal rules: limits, time windows, allowed recipients and functions, extra confirmation, emergency stop, revocation.

3 · Guardian Enforcement

Built · tested locally

Contract permission checks and RiskEngine apply the final, mandatory decision on supported on-chain paths.

Guardian AI signals go to policy or a human; they never authorize a payment on their own.

Technical proof · Security Kernel v2 RC

189 contract tests passed. Zero failures.

189

contract tests passed

0

failures · 0 skipped

0/0

Slither High / Medium

3/3

SDK tests passed

Confirmed in local RC runs

  • Authorized transfer executes
  • Over-budget transfer is blocked
  • Replayed operation is rejected
  • Permission reuse is checked
  • Balance controls hold

How it was tested

  • Fuzz testing
  • Stateful invariant testing
  • Static analysis: Slither
  • Local chain: Anvil, chain ID 31337
  • Retained findings: 14 Low · 11 Informational · 1 Optimization

Source: internal RC report, 23 October 2026. An earlier enforcement core — 5 contracts and 127 tests (1 August 2026) — is available for code review under NDA. Nothing is deployed yet and no independent audit has been completed.

Who runs on GEBRID

Eight agent classes, one control layer

Each agent gets an identity, an owner, a budget and permissions it cannot exceed.

01

Trading agents

Market analysis and permitted trades

02

DeFi agents

Protocol actions within set permissions

03

Risk agents

Operation checks and risk scoring

04

Guardian agents

Independent control of other agents

05

Treasury agents

Approved corporate finance flows

06

Research agents

Collect, analyze and structure information

07

Enterprise agents

Workflow automation across systems

08

Developer agents

Coding, testing and maintenance

Target scenarios for the platform — not a list of shipped commercial products.

$GEBRID token

A liquidity-first, low-unlock design

Working model — Tokenomics v6 (23 October 2026), updated 4 November 2026: founders investment unlocks 10% at TGE. No token has been issued and the TGE is not scheduled.

Ticker

GEBRID (working)

Network

Base · EVM

Total supply

1,000,000,000

Proposed pair

GEBRID / USDT

TGE

Not scheduled

Contract

Pending final release

4.5%

of supply unlocks at TGE — 45,000,000 tokens

Exchange liquidity & MM — 30M (67%)Pre-seed — 5MFounders investment — 5MPrivate — 2.5MPublic IDO — 2.5M

0% at TGE for team, seed, strategic/VC and treasury.

Planned market-making structure: the 30M stay in the treasury multisig and are loaned to a disclosed market maker under a written agreement — defined use, fixed term, unused tokens returned, no profit-sharing or guaranteed-return terms.

1Btotal supply
Investors26%Pre-seed 5 · Seed 6 · Strategic/VC 10 · Private 5
Founders & Team23%Founders investment 5 · Team & advisors 18
Ecosystem growth21%Protocol rewards 12 · Ecosystem partners 5 · Marketing/BD 4
Treasury / DAO12%12-month cliff, 48-month vesting
Reserves10%Reserve 2 · Unallocated 8 (emission disabled)
Public5%Public IDO 2.5 · Airdrop 2.5
Exchange liquidity & MM3%Market making at the exchange listing · 100% at TGE
AllocationShareTokensTGECliffVesting
Founders investment5%50M10%12 mo48 mo
Pre-seed5%50M10%6 mo18 mo
Seed6%60M0%6 mo24 mo
Strategic / VC10%100M0%12 mo36 mo
Private5%50M5%6 mo12 mo
Public IDO2.5%25M10%1 mo12 mo
Team & advisors18%180M0%12 mo48 mo
Treasury / DAO12%120M0%12 mo48 mo
Protocol rewards12%120M0%6 mo60 mo
Ecosystem partners5%50M0%6 mo24 mo
Marketing / BD4%40M0%3 mo18 mo
Airdrop2.5%25M0%6 mo6 mo
Exchange liquidity & market making3%30M100%——
Reserve2%20M0%24 mo24 mo
Unallocated reserve8%80M0%not setdisabled
Total100%1,000M45M

Marketing/BD (4%): a share unlocks at TGE for exchange launch campaigns; size set with the exchange’s requirements.

Months from TGE. The first linear release happens in the month after the cliff ends. All parameters are subject to final legal and technical review and to commitments already agreed with investors.

Why the network needs $GEBRID

Three planned sources of demand, each tied to a part of the security layer.

01 · ATTESTER BONDS

Stake to sign risk verdicts

Attesters lock GEBRID to publish RiskEngine attestations. A false or manipulated attestation is slashed.

Demand grows with the number of attesters and the value they secure.

Builds on ATTESTER_ROLE · planned
02 · METERED CHECKS

Pay per security check

Each Guardian or RiskEngine check on paid tiers is billed in GEBRID; a share is burned or sent to the treasury.

Demand grows with agent activity: every checked action uses tokens.

Planned
03 · AGENT LICENSING

Settle agent licences

Licences, rentals and transfers of agent identities (ERC-721 / ERC-6551) settle through GEBRID escrow.

Demand grows with marketplace volume.

Planned

Also planned: governance of selected parameters and developer incentives.

None of these mechanics is live yet: the verified core runs without the token today, and staking, slashing, fee sharing and governance are planned. Nothing here is an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy tokens, and no price or return is promised.

Business model

Seven revenue lines on one platform

01

GEBRID OS SaaS

Subscription to the agent operating environment

02

Enterprise Agent Infrastructure

Integration with corporate systems and finance tools

03

Guardian Security Services

Independent control, policy and action checks

04

Developer SDK & API

Licensing of infrastructure modules

05

Agent Marketplace

Fees on licensing, transfer and use of agents

06

Risk-as-a-Service

Risk enforcement for external agent platforms

07

Infrastructure Partnerships

Joint builds with exchanges, wallets and AI providers

Pre-revenue

These are planned models. No ARR, MRR or paying-user revenue is claimed.

Intellectual property

Ten directions under patent work

01On-chain agent identity
02Risk-attested execution
03Delegated permissions
04Agent continuity
05Secure agent migration
06Security enforcement
07Cross-domain actions
08Verifiable security evidence
09Agent licensing & transfer
10ZK-related security mechanisms

Patent families

GEBRID-001
GEBRID-002

Filing status, ownership and USPTO documents are shared in due diligence once official confirmations are reconciled.

Applications are not presented as granted patents.

Roadmap

Seven phases from kernel to ecosystem

  1. PHASE 1

    Foundation

    Identity, permissions, RiskEngine

    Built · local tests
  2. PHASE 3

    OS Integration

    Kernel, orchestrator, runtime

    In development
  3. PHASE 4

    Guardian & Continuity

    Guardian AI, memory, MCP security

    Prototypes
  4. PHASE 5

    Commercial Pilots

    Wallets, AI platforms, enterprise

    Qualifying partners
  5. PHASE 6

    Token & TGE

    Final contract, review, market making, exchanges

    Preparation
  6. PHASE 7

    Ecosystem

    Marketplace, licensing, SDK

    Product roadmap

Phase dates are set once technical readiness and resources are confirmed.